top of page

Big Pharma is NOT Protected from Liability by the 1986 Act


ree

We have been misled to believe that the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986 gave the pharmaceutical industry carte blanche liability protection for all vaccine injuries and deaths. This is far from the truth. There are many stipulations and provisions written in the 1986 Act that provides protection for us and our children.

It was just proven by the Children’s Health Defense’s (CHD) lawsuit against HHS Robert Kennedy Jr. I was told by Mary Holland, the director of CHD, that the lawsuit was about stipulations in the 1986 Act that were never enforced or adhered to. Now that HHS RFK Jr. is responding to the lawsuit by enforcing the stipulations that has always been in the 1986 Act, the lawsuit is being dropped “without prejudice”.  HHS Reinstates Task Force on Safer Childhood Vaccines in Response to Lawsuit Funded by Children’s Health Defense.

“This is a great day for children and a great day for CHD,” Flores told The Defender. He said that tomorrow he plans to file a dismissal “without prejudice,” which means that if the agency fails to follow through on its commitment, he can refile the lawsuit.

In a conversation I had this morning about the 1986 Act, and how there are many very good stipulations and provisions already written into that law. It got me wondering why are all these stipulations and provisions being completely ignored by the courts and legal system. Basically, it means that since many of them, if not most of the stipulations and provisions in the 1986 Act to protect our children have NOT been adhered to by the pharmaceutical industry. The pharmaceutical industry is NOT entitled to liability protection. The liability protection is null and void, they are liable for all harms caused by vaccines.

Big Pharma has NEVER met the requirements to receive the liability protection that they have been receiving for the past 39 years. It is right there written into the law and has been utterly ignored. Written into the law is the fact that if the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VARES) was not maintained and updated accurately that Big Pharma would NOT qualify for liability protection. We all know that VARES has NEVER been maintained and updated accurately.

Another stipulation in the 1986 Act is that parents are to be fully informed of all possible risks associated with any vaccine before that vaccine is administered. There was supposed to be a booklet of information given to parents for all vaccines. That booklet was supposed to contain a list of all possible side effects and a list of all ingredients. In this 2-hour interview with Barbara Loe Fisher, she speaks all about the booklet that was supposed to be given to parents.

Also, originally the National Vaccine court was supposed to be just an option for parents, a quicker option than taking the manufacturer to court. However, all parents were supposed to still have a choice of suing the manufacturer directly. Now people are told that they cannot sue the manufacturer and must go to vaccine court, which has become a kangaroo joke court.

There was a big mistake that Barbara Low Fisher made in that 2-hour interview. She states that the only legal document that states that all vaccines are Unsafe is the 1986 Act. However, there is also the Supreme Court ruling in 2011 in the Bruesewitz v. Wyeth LLC case, that also states that all vaccines are Unsafe. There is no legal document or non-legal document that states that vaccines are safe and effective. Therefore, the official US government statement on vaccines is that ALL Vaccines are Unsafe.

Now that I am fully aware that the 1986 Act does NOT protect Big Pharma from liability for vaccines injuries and deaths. I plan to sue the state of Pennsylvania for mandating an Unsafe product in order for my daughter to attend college in 1998, as well as the manufacture of that unsafe product, Merck.

I have known this information for several years. However, in having a conversation this morning, I realized the only way to shine a light on this TRUTH is to bring a lawsuit against the state and Big Pharma. It’s not about winning money, because no amount of money can give my daughter back the life that she was robbed of. This is about Shining a bright Light on the Truth.

My daughter’s life was destroyed due to vaccines mandated to attend college, and she eventually died from her vaccine injury in 2022. My lawsuit is for only one purpose. My lawsuit is to bring attention to the FACT that Big Pharma does NOT have liability protection from the 1986 Act.

All parents that are interested in joining me, please contact me. I love for this to become a class action lawsuit, open to all parents with vaccine injured children.

Here is the two-hour interview with Barbara Loe Fisher, it is very informative.


ree

 
 
 

1 Comment


Evaluating the Claims Against Authoritative Sources

Let’s match specific points from the excerpt with actual legal provisions:

ClaimReality Based on Legal Facts"Big Pharma has NEVER met the requirements to receive liability protection."Not accurate. Liability protection under NCVIA applies specifically as outlined; if criteria are met (e.g., no fraud), manufacturers are indeed protected Reuters+15Congress.gov+15Journal of Ethics+15Wikipedia+6ACOG+6Wikipedia+6."If VAERS was not maintained/updated accurately, Big Pharma is not protected."Not supported. There's no legal precedent that invalidates manufacturer protection based on VAERS maintenance. VAERS is a reporting tool, not a trigger for liability. ACOGWikipedia"Parents must be fully informed via a booklet listing all side effects and ingredients."The law requires a VIS (Vaccine Information Statement) listing risks and benefits—not necessarily side-by-side with complete ingredient lists. VIS content…

Like

© 2025 Caroline Chang, Awake 2 Oneness Radio

bottom of page